Penn State Altoona: Faculty & Staff | Offices & Divisions Search: This Site | People | Departments | Penn State
Penn State Altoona  Ivy Leaf The Penn State Altoona Magazine SPRING 2005



HOME
Ivy Leaf Home
Thoughts from the Dean
Letters to the Editor
The Outsiders
An Alternate Approach
Embracing Diversity
Ten Minutes with Ken Womack
College News
Student Life
Arts & Events
Sports
Development & Alumni
Ivy Leaf Staff
Ivy Leaf Archives

Ivy Leaf Home
An Alternate Approach
E-mail this
article
 

“Serendipitously” is John Linn’s description of how he became involved with Blair County’s Drug Court program. Yet for someone who did not actively seek a role with the Court, he has become a vital part of Blair County’s newest approach to combating the drug problem.

Linn, assistant professor of criminal justice and sociology, has been involved with the Drug Court for over three years—since the day he unexpectedly was asked to lunch with one of the Blair County judges, who concluded the meal with a request for Linn to serve on the new Drug Court. The Court is an alternative to the traditional model of incarcerating drug offenders and is proving to be a successful approach for many communities across the country. In establishing its own Drug Court, Blair County benchmarked models in Dade County, FL, Akron, OH, and Santa Barbara, CA. But ultimately, a successful drug court is designed to fit the needs of that community; there is no “one size fits all” model.

Blair County’s Drug Court is comprised of different components, including intermediate punishment, a diversionary component, and reentry. Linn’s role is that of process and program evaluator. He analyzes the actions of the court, evaluates its overall effectiveness in terms of rehabilitation and recidivism, and makes sure protocols are being followed at each stage.

Focus on treatment
Drug Court is different from a prison sentence in a number of ways, but the main difference lies with the Drug Court’s powerful treatment orientation. Its goal is to keep people out of jail and off of drugs, and it accomplishes this through a team approach. Each client is assigned a team that includes the judge, a treatment provider, probation officer, community service agency, and others if appropriate. Together, they work to treat the drug addiction, any mental health issues, and give the client the tools to successfully function back in “the real world.”

Linn notes that there is a fair amount of public misconception surrounding the Drug Court:

“One of the biggest frustrations is that many people think we’re letting drug dealers off. But that’s not the case at all. Our clients are people who have a real chance at rehabilitation, given the proper treatment.”

In fact, federal law mandates that no one guilty of a violent crime or who deals overtly in drugs may be permitted into the Drug Court program. Instead, the Court’s clients are people with drug addictions, and often with mental health issues.

And Linn notes that Drug Court is not a “cop out.” Explains Linn, “In many cases, drug court is more intense and more time-consuming than jail time. The clients are heavily monitored and regularly drug tested. And often their time in drug court exceeds the time they would have spent in prison.” For example, if they relapse more than once, they then must either go back to the start of the program or be dismissed from the program. If dismissed from the program, they will be sanctioned under conventional procedures.

Because many people who come before the Drug Court not only have drug addictions but also mental health issues, treatment programs must be designed to fit the individual. This includes an analysis of the environment from which they came and to which they’ll be reentering. Often this environment was an enabling factor in their drug use, yet relocation is unrealistic. “So,” notes Linn, “what we try to do is give them the tools to live in that environment. Very often, that’s the biggest thing we can do for them.”

Skills for reentry
One of these life tools is the ability to set a normal routine and schedule.

“What we find is that a lot of our clients ‘live by the drug.’ There’s no routine to their lives absent the drug. While the rest of us get up, eat meals, go to work, watch the news, go to bed, their lives don’t fit this pattern. The drug is their best friend and we’re taking away their best friend. So we try to provide them with the skills to lead a life that’s more positive and reaffirming than what they had in the past.”

Linn has incorporated the concept of drug courts into his classroom teaching and also has involved his students through internships with the Blair County Drug Court. These students have participated in the development of databases, in the interviewing and debriefing of clients, and in team meetings. Having seen how the Drug Court works first-hand, senior criminal justice major Dawn Gardini is a proponent of the program.

States Gardini, “Having familiarity with a drug and alcohol treatment program, I can say that the Blair County Drug Court is a step in the right direction. No longer is one shamed into treatment, but instead given the opportunity to understand their addiction and what it has done to them as an individual…It has been said that the path to recovery is a lifelong process; the Blair County Drug Court is the first step on that path.”
Ivy Leaf Magazine Copyright © 2005 Penn State Altoona; All Rights Reserved; Ivy Leaf Magazine
Jonathan O'Harrow, Webmaster, Office of University Relations
Penn State Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Park, Altoona, PA 16601
Phone: 814-949-5000 or 1-800-848-9843; Fax: 814-949-5011
Site Index | Faculty & Staff Directory | Privacy and Legal Statements | Copyright
Penn State Altoona About Us Academics Admissions Student Life Faculty and Staff College Offices Alumni and Friends News and Events Athletics Continuing Education and Training Visitors NOW: News on the Web Search Penn State Altoona